It has saved me hours and hours of time and frustration. With Process Lasso it doesn't, ever, as if a process is in danger of "taking over" the system, it just slows it down so the OS can run normally.
PROCESS LASSO GIVEAWAYOFTHEDAY WINDOWS
Before I used it, if the processes on the computer got to heavy Windows could freeze. I still get to points that i am filling up the system with my work.įor me Process Lasso is the thing that makes Windows better than for example a Mac. I maxed out my RAM to the most the machine can fit, which is 16GB. Sometimes I end up working on 12GB+ files. I am a "power user" as I work night and day with huge Photoshop files, at the same time as working with texts, emails, sometimes watching videos, etc. My subjective speculation is - it seems for me impossible that someone without god knows how much information on the kernel and MANY years of testing\progrmaming could give a general tangible performance improvement (atleast on newer OS').Ĭan it somehow undo memory locking and thread waiting from badly programmed applications ?ĭoubtful - but i geuss i'll find out in the next few days. How the fuck does it get this data? - and how does it do this without a massive cloud DB that rates each program in conjunction or atleast defines types of programs? In order for this application to decide how each application needs to be assigned resources - it needs data to make decisions. (Microsoft's history aside - they've bettered themselves in the technical execution last decade). I need to know how the hell it can presume to do a better job of this - than windows itself.
I need to hear some firsthand experience how it tangibly changes this - AND does it better on NON CMT\HT chips and those with. I don't really need to hear your spurt a bunch of BS about they're naming and roles to the execution of the system\OS. Tons of priorities, and ports that shuttle data around. There are tons of stages and handlers within our modern computer eco system. the application can test system responsiveness - but you can't quantify a metric in how it determines what to "boost affinity" to? - nor can you give a value\unit metric on how this application chooses to make it better?ĭo you realize how stupid you sound (And possible are?) PS: Keep your annoying fanboi attitude towards anyone with what you think is affinity towards certain things at homeĪgain - useless whining and not deflecting what i want to point out. While a defintive % value unit would be hard to coin out - the experience itself should be easy for a tester to explaind and document. Run some hardcore resource hogging programs - and add jabbed spikes of starting other processes and timed events - while prioritizing the resource hogger to see and document a definitive better "experience" at the hands of having the lower jabs run more slowly. I do not understand why a product that would offer more smoothiness - doesn't give a copy to someone who would decently test it. Which i hope microsoft with win8\win7 would do best themselves by now. I never question the fact that' adjusting priorities for execution can halt and stall several bottlenecks in the processed pipeline that is the windows kernel - i questioned how exactly it's "automatism" can do it better than than windows itself on a general level. Your being a pedantic strawman ignoring what i asked for.Īnything you feel can be fairly documented on tick timings - with a various simple programming. Jesus christ - i geuss it'd be hard to expect some nuanced words from certain fanatic people like you.
0 kommentar(er)
